New research on cell phones and brain tumors

Kathrin Ziegler/Getty

As cell phones are growing more prevalent—an estimated 270 million Americans now have one—concerns about the health risks of the mobile devices are increasing as well. As Bryan Walsh reported for TIME earlier this year, the growing trend of cell phone use—or, cast in a different light, of holding tiny emitters of low-level radiation up to our heads several times a day—has scientists concerned, to say the least. Yet, according to preliminary research conducted by the Danish Cancer Society, as of yet there’s not enough evidence to declare the danger of our devotion to hand-held devices. An analysis of brain cancer cases throughout Scandinavia from 1974 to 2003 found that, trends in tumor rates have been consistent since before mobile phones came into widespread usage.

As the BBC reports, the analysis, which included some 16 million adults between the ages of 20 to 79, found that trends of brain tumor incidence were consistent in the last 10-15 years, when mobile phones came into popularity, with before cell phones first began to emerge. Brain cancers known as gliomas increased 0.5% per year among men, and 0.2% per year among women, and meningioma cancers increased by 0.8% per year among men, and 3.8% per year among women. (The sharper increase among women is largely attributable to the female population between the ages of 60 to 79, researchers say.)

These findings, which expand on previous research that analyzed trends through 1998, don’t rule out the possibility that cell phones may have harmful effects evident after more long-term use, researchers say. As Dr. Alison Ross, a senior science information offer at Cancer UK, told the BBC:

“Overall, the scientific evidence tells us that using mobile phones for less than 10 years does not increase the risk of cancer and this large study supports that conclusion… However, brain tumors often take a very long time to develop so we will need to look for any future changes in incidence rates to see if mobile phones could pose any longer-term risks.”

In other words, the jury is still out.

Related Topics: brain tumor, cell phone, mobile phone, Cancer, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Healthland

    Getty Images

    Stoned Driving Nearly Doubles the Risk of a Fatal Crash

    People who drive within three hours of smoking marijuana are at nearly twice the risk of being in an accident that leads to serious injury or death, compared with sober drivers, according to a new review of the research.

    Doctors Cheating in Dermatology ExamsCNN Health

    Jacob Halaska / Getty Images

    A Cancer Drug Reverses Alzheimer’s Disease in Mice

    Mice are not men, so let’s not get too excited yet, but scientists have discovered that an existing cancer drug quickly reverses Alzheimer’s symptoms in rodents.

  • http://www.pricedoc.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-latest-info-on-cell-phones-and-brain-tumors/ The Latest Info on Cell Phones and Brain Tumors | PriceDoc Talk

    [...] However, “according to preliminary research conducted by the Danish Cancer Society, as of yet there’s not enough evidence to declare the danger of our devotion to hand-held devices,” reports TIME. [...]

  • http://willtaft.com/health/cell-phones-and-brain-cancer/ Cell Phones and Brain Cancer | Healthy Living

    [...] magazine linked their article to Google, trying to draw readers to the Time blog site.  The Time article itself was headlined “New research on cell phones and brain tumors”.  Innocuous enough and a [...]

  • medpie1

    The majority of the peer reviewed research claims otherwise. There appears to be an established link to brain cancers especially on the side in which you use the cellphone.

    http://www.medpie.com/top-health-stories/in-the-news/Cellphone.html

  • http://wellness.blogs.time.com/2009/12/21/maine-lawmakers-mull-cancer-warning-for-cell-phones/ Maine lawmakers mull cancer warning for cell phones – Wellness – TIME.com

    [...] recent study from the Danish Cancer Society found that cell phone use did not increase brain tumor rates. But [...]

  • http://jehnavi.wordpress.com jehnavi

    The report’s main conclusions are: There is a “significant” risk of brain tumors from cell phone use; EMR exposure limits used by governments and supported by the telecom industry do not take into consideration the non-thermal effects of EMR exposure; and design flaws of the Interphone study include selection bias, insufficient latency time to expect a tumor diagnosis, unrealistic definition of what makes a “regular” cell phone user, exclusion of a large number of people, including children and young adults, users of cordless phones, people too ill with brain tumors to be interviewed, and people with particular types of brain tumors.

    http://www.justcancer.org/facts-and-information-on-brain-cancer.html

  • http://www.androplex.com/07/21/should-htc-evo-users-be-worried-about-cell-phone-radiation/ Should HTC EVO users be worried about cell phone radiation?

    [...] Thus we have city officials in San Francisco who are again perplexing to pass argumentative legislation that would force dungeon phone retailers to post pithy notices about radiofrequency (RF) exposure, as good as make additional fact sheets accessible to business who ask them. Now, we consider clarity is indeed a good thing, so I’m not indispensably opposite this. However, we also trust that many of a fears surrounding dungeon phone deviation are substantially blown usually a bit out of proportion. After all, many scientists trust that brain growth rates now are unchanging with rates before dungeon phones became so popular. [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus