Doctor behind vaccine-autism link loses license

  • Share
  • Read Later

It took nearly six months but the General Medical Council (GMC) in the U.K. has pulled Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s license to practice medicine in the United Kingdom.

Wakefield is the researcher who nearly single-handedly fueled parental concerns about the link between vaccines and autism. In 1998, he published a paper in the medical journal Lancet describing eight children who showed signs of autism within days of being inoculated for measles, mumps and rubella. A gastroenterologist by training, Wakefield went on in further studies to suggest that the virus from the vaccine was leading to inflammation in the youngsters’ guts that then impeded normal brain development.

Further investigations by other researchers in the decades since have failed to confirm his claims, and in January, the GMC ruled that Wakefield had acted “dishonestly and irresponsibly” in conducting the experiments that led to the publication of the paper. According to the BBC, among his alleged acts of misconduct were conducting those studies without ethical approval of the hospital at which he practiced, and paying children at his son’s birthday party for blood samples. He also served as a paid consultant to attorneys of parents who believed their children had been harmed by vaccines.

In February, editors of the Lancet retracted Wakefield’s controversial paper, telling the Guardian “It was utterly clear, without any ambiguity at all, that the statements in the paper were utterly false.”

Defending his career on the Today show on Monday, Wakefield, now in the U.S., vowed to appeal the decision and maintained that “there are millions of children out there suffering, and the fact [is] that the vaccines cause autism.” Without a license to practice medicine, and the growing evidence to the contrary, it’s going to harder for him to prove that claim.

14 comments
AnnaSim
AnnaSim

Only aspire to mention ones content can be as incredible. This clarity with your post is superb and that i may think you’re a guru for this issue. High-quality along with your concur permit me to to seize your current give to keep modified by using approaching blog post. Thanks a lot hundreds of along with you should go on the pleasurable get the job done.

http://rebelmouse.com/hsveraserreviews/


fnook1331
fnook1331

autism is a genetic developmental condition that only occurs when there is a genetic disposition at play. the odds of a child gaining it after birth is impossible as it is starts in the fetal stage before the child is born. autism runs in families in the majority of the time. the websites that everyone else listed on this thread are not reputable domains nor are their info anything but a witch hunt for info that simply is not plausible or possible.

linja2
linja2

@fnook1331  you never saw your child take a 180 degree turn for the worse within 24 hrs of a vaccine, later determined to be the only vaccine the child had had containing MERCURY, and never regain his good nature or social abilities, and then to have this event diagnosed as "autism," really a poison to the frontal lobe.  Although vaccines are not the only cause of autism, they are still a very real cause.  Bicycles are not the only cause of traffic injuries or broken legs, either.  Ask why Somalis are more prone to autism upon vaccination.  Ask why this:  none of the study reports I have read ever refer to a sizeable CONTROL group of unvaccinated children as having just as much autism as the vaccinated group.  Control groups are the centerpiece of legitimate research.  People like Paul Offitt have a lot of power, and a huge agenda, not the least of which is his history of making an enormous amount of money off the pharmaceutical industry.  One of fifty children has autism.  Many are vaccine injuries.  The rate goes up with every increase of vaccines on the schedule "recommended." 

Raw
Raw

@fnook1331 Like I'm really sorry if you have anyone with Autism. But you are wrong. 

CutTheNonsense
CutTheNonsense

@TrippedOverWords lmao "Take the word of this obviously anti-science website!!" The article linked has absolutely nothing to do with vaccines, you ignoramus. Try reading. It's literally about the autistic children with gastrointestinal disorders. I even searched for the word "vaccine" to see if I could find it, and it was not even in the article.

The court case states that the vaccine *aggravated* a mitochondrial disorder. The child very well may have began exhibiting autistic behavior without the vaccination. 

Also, those articles are from well over a year ago. Here's one from Forbes from the same time period about the same case: http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2013/08/09/court-rulings-dont-confirm-autism-vaccine-link/