A lawsuit to get toys out of Happy Meals?

Less than two months after a California county voted to ban toys from children’s meals at fast food restaurants, the chain known for the Hamburgler and Ronald McDonald may face a lawsuit over the the trinkets it tosses into Happy Meals. Public health research and advocacy group, the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), sent a letter (PDF) to McDonald’s yesterday denouncing the practice of marketing unhealthy meals to children with the incentive of toys as illegal, and threatening to bring a lawsuit if McDonald’s doesn’t stop the practice.

In the statement about the potential law suit, the CSPI says that McDonald’s has skirted the true issue at the heart of its 2007 pledge not to advertise any meals containing 600 calories or more to children. Ads aimed at kids often feature apple slices or other healthy options available in Happy Meals, the letter points out, but in a CSPI study of 44 McDonald’s locations, 93% of the time customers were not asked what side items they wanted in the meal, and the default was always french fries. Beyond that, the CSPI letter points out that not a single Happy Meal meets basic nutrition and calorie recommendations. As Stephen Gardner, litigation director for CSPI writes in the letter addressed to the CEO of McDonald’s Corporation and president of McDonald’s USA:

“McDonald’s practice of dangling toys in front of children is illegal, regardless of what meal the child eventually gets. Not only does the practice mobilize “pester power,” but it also imprints on developing minds brand loyalty for McDonald’s. Because most of the company’s options (for young children and others) are of poor nutritional quality, eating Happy Meals promotes eating habits that are virtually assured to undermine children’s health.”

McDonald’s spokesman William Whitman objected to the CSPI portrayal of the company’s marketing practices as “predatory and wrong.” Speaking with the Los Angeles Times he said that Happy Meals are the right size for children and that toys are “just one part of a fun, family experience at McDonald’s.”

Ronald McDonald has been having a bumpy month. Before the World Cup started, an international cancer charity criticized FIFA for choosing unhealthy sponsors such as McDonald’s for the world’s most-watched sporting event, and just days later McDonald’s had to recall 12 million glasses promoting the latest Shrek film after they learned they contained the toxic metal cadmium.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Healthland

    Jamie Grill / Iconica / Getty Images

    A History of Kids and Sleep: Why They Never Get Enough

    Even a century ago, children were getting less sleep than experts recommended.

    Teen Pregnancy Rates Hit 40 Year LowCNN Health

    Caspar Benson / Getty Images

    Study: Overeating May Double the Risk of Memory Loss

    Passing on a second helping of dessert may not only maintain your waistline but also your memory.

  • mkassowitz

    Advertising of unhealthy food products to children seems to be an age-old, “time honored” practice. McDonald’s is one of the pioneers of what could be called “parent coercion marketing.” But we need to come to grips with the ethical implications of it. Unfortunately, McDonald’s is not nearly the only culprit in these practices. Our major cereal manufacturers are right there with them. The epidemic of childhood obesity and the proliferation of allergies can be traced to crappy foods marketed to our kids. http://organicconnectmag.com/wp/2010/05/david-s-ludwig-md-phd-ending-the-childhood-obesity-epidemic/

  • marbee

    Whatever libtards disapprove of they have to ban it. They don’t like a parent swatting a kid on the butt for running into traffic, they get it banned, who cares if the kid gets run over. So let’s take their toys away too, we wouldn’t want happy children either. IDIOTS!

  • ichoosefreedom4me

    “parent coercion marketing.” ??? Who is this idiot?

    What the hell is wrong with this country? It is a PARENTAL DECISION to allow a toy in their children’s happy meal, NOT OUR NANNY GOVERNMENT and certainly not a non-profit, tax exempt entity…yet ANOTHER well funding group.

    Does anyone know who the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is? They’re the PROFITABLE “non” profit of Johnson & Johnson. They BOUGHT smoking bans with tax exempt grants to groups like the ACS, AHA, ALA…they created and funded Tobacco-Free Kids. They own 42,343,491 shares of Johnson & Johnson stock. Johnson & Johnson SELLS THE PATCHES AND THE GUM. Now, take a guess who also funds this Scenter for Science in the “public” interest? RWJF. RWJF is hot on the obesity gig because THEY SELL SPLENDA!! The OWN EthiconEndo, the bariatric surgery company. WAKE UP PEOPLE. You’re letting well funded nanny organizations take your RIGHTS TO PARENT AWAY. PUSH BACK. Maybe we should just sign our kids over to these groups now and let them raise them.

  • marbee

    Yes, I agree with ichoosefreedom, push back and tell the gov’t to BAN those 24/7 pharma ads for things you can’t get without a prescription. The ads that tell kids it’s completely normal to take drugs for everything. Maybe then kids wouldn’t be dying everyday from raiding the medicine cabinet! Where is the outrage for this!

blog comments powered by Disqus