How Parental Smoking Affects Kids

There’s plenty of data showing how harmful smoking can be, and that goes for both smokers and the people around them. Two studies published in Pediatrics point out how indirect the effects can be. A study of paternal smoking in Hong Kong finds that children whose fathers smoke are heavier at seven and 11 years old than their counterparts who have non smoking dads; and investigation of children in Britain and Brazil finds that moms who smoke may be trigger behavioral problems in their children.

In the Hong Kong study, researchers at the University of Hong Kong studied a unique cohort of 6519 children born in 1997, for whom health records and information on household smoking was available. Among the cohort, more fathers than mothers lit up, and children of smoking fathers showed a greater change from average BMI charts than those whose fathers did not. Because fathers in the Chinese culture have a minimal role in diet and lifestyle choices of their children, the authors speculate that the fathers’ cigarette habit was affect their children’s obesity via biological mechanisms, through second hand exposure.

The second study, led by Marie-Jo Brion at the University of Bristol, aimed to adjust for all of the usual factors that might influence children’s mental and social health states—these included factors such as depression in the parents, parental education, the family’s social status and income, and parental alcohol consumption. By comparing two populations—a middle class group in Britain and a lower income group in Brazil, where smoking rates are generally higher—the researchers also hoped to isolate smoking effects that are independent of socioeconomic status. If the effect of lighting up persisted in both groups, they surmised, then it would suggest a stronger potential causal relationship.

In the end, mother’s smoking increased by an average of 53% the risk that children in both populations would be aggressive, break rules, bully, cheat or otherwise display disobedient behavior, compared to kids of non smoking moms. The effect of paternal smoking was nearly half that of maternal smoking, which leads the researchers to conclude that smoking’s effect on behavior is occurring during pregnancy. Among both groups, an average of 18% of mothers continued to smoke more than 20 cigarettes per day during pregnancy, despite public health messages warning about the potentially harmful effects of the habit on the growing fetus.

And that’s where Brion hopes studies like hers can have an impact. “We’re keen on studying the effects of smoking in children among women who are still smoking during pregnancy, to get a clearer picture of the effects on child development that might help to lower that a bit,” she says.

Related Topics: Mental Health, Obesity, smoking, Child Development, Mental Health, Parenting, Tobacco
  • Latest on Healthland

    Getty Images

    Stoned Driving Nearly Doubles the Risk of a Fatal Crash

    People who drive within three hours of smoking marijuana are at nearly twice the risk of being in an accident that leads to serious injury or death, compared with sober drivers, according to a new review of the research.

    Doctors Cheating in Dermatology ExamsCNN Health

    Jacob Halaska / Getty Images

    A Cancer Drug Reverses Alzheimer’s Disease in Mice

    Mice are not men, so let’s not get too excited yet, but scientists have discovered that an existing cancer drug quickly reverses Alzheimer’s symptoms in rodents.

  • qaz668

    There is an alternative that exposes nobody in public (or private) places to any smoke.

    I got my mother to try an electronic cigarette. They produce a smoke-like, water based, nicotine containing vapor that completely reproduces the satisfaction of smoking, without any smoke. They allow her to avoid the tar, carbon monoxide, and thousands of chemicals.

    She had smoked for over 50-years, yet, she has not touched a regular cigarette since she got the kit I bought her from http://www.CleanGreenNicotine.com. She says she lost her morning smoker’s cough within days.

    Also, the refill cartridges that you buy for the electronic cigarettes are about 1/2 the cost of regular cigarettes. Avoid the cheaper electronic cigarette brands that are made in China. They have a poor history of quality control. They can’t keep contaminants out of their food supply or the toys made in China. For my peace of mind, the brand I selected for my mom is Made in the USA and provides a 30-day money-back guarantee.

  • http://harleyrider1978.wordpress.com harleyrider1978

    Junk science in,junk science out and especially these so called professionals doing the so called study………Its just as feasible that the parents couldnt afford better food because of the high taxes on tobacco products.But when we look back say 10 years we see where the BMI factor equation was changed and overnite even sylvester stallone became OBESE……..

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2542863/posts

    More ill informed smoker bashing. I do not think the authors would argue with me that smoking over the last 60 years smoking has more than halved (UK 1948 66% of the population, 2009 22.5%) but asthma has risen by 300% (again in the UK). So smoking is not the primary cause of asthma and atopy, I assume the doctor’s cars and industrial pollution. The inconvenient truth is that the only studies of children of smokers suggest it is PROTECTIVE in contracting atopy in the first place. The New Zealand study says by a staggering factor of 82%.

    “Participants with atopic parents were also less likely to have positive SPTs between ages 13 and 32 years if they smoked themselves (OR=0.18), and this reduction in risk remained significant after adjusting for confounders.

    The authors write: “We found that children who were exposed to parental smoking and those who took up cigarette smoking themselves had a lower incidence of atopy to a range of common inhaled allergens.
    “These associations were found only in those with a parental history of asthma or hay fever.”

    They conclude: Our findings suggest that preventing allergic sensitization is not one of them.”

    http://www.medwire-news.md/…/…gic_sensitization...

    This is a Swedish study.

    “Children of mothers who smoked at least 15 cigarettes a day tended to have lower odds for suffering from allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, allergic asthma, atopic eczema and food allergy, compared to children of mothers who had never smoked (ORs 0.6-0.7)

    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between current exposure to tobacco smoke and a low risk for atopic disorders in smokers themselves and a similar tendency in their children.”

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubm…pubmed/ 11422156

    In conclusion let’s have a balanced debate and not characterise smokers as race akin to the devil.

    There have been 34 studies into lung cancer and exposure to cigarette smoke as a child. 3 suggest a raised risk, nearly four times as many 11 suggest PROTECTION with 20 suggesting no raised or reduced risk. The most famous is the World Health Organization 1998 study which concluded:

    “Results: ETS exposure during childhood was not associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (odds ratio [OR] for ever exposure = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64–0.96).”

    “Conclusions: Our results indicate no association between childhood exposure to ETS and lung cancer risk.”

    This actually suggests as the upper limit is <_1.0 it="it" is="is" a="a" protection="protection" .

  • annmid

    I don’t think there is a single biological connection between smoking and other childhood characteristics. I think it’s more psycho/social. Parents who smoke are more like to exhibit other marginal behaviors such as having less education and poor decisions making ability. These are personality traits which lend themselves to less effective/successful parenting.

  • hallaquila

    Overly simplistic conclusion not taking into consideration a variety of socio-economic factors, culture, religion, etc. Baby boomers in America know that when they were children over one-third of Americans smoked and probably higher in the tobacco-producing states of Virginia, Maryland, and North Carolina. The quality of parenting, ie. supportive, nurturing, emphasis on reading and education, connection with the community, and church carry much greater weight than whether parents smoked or not. Though researchers love to target tobacco, but those grey clouds over America, particularly urban areas, are not caused by rabid smokers. The variety and amount of toxins identifiable in our blood from fossile fuels and other pollutants are also impacting our lives and our children.

  • http://graciouslivingdaybyday.wordpress.com Liliana

    Smoking is bad – really, really bad for the smoker and all those around him or her.

    We now need to study the adverse effects of other societal problems- radiation in cell phones, environmental contaminants, etc.

    I especially worry about the cell phone use by young children (including my own.) What will we be finding out in a few decades?

    http://graciouslivingdaybyday.com/

  • jenstate

    We can talk all day about the impact of smoking on our children, but we also need to talk about stopping. Educating smokers on the benefits of quitting using hard numbers will at least get some of them to pay attention. I read that long term smoking cuts your life short by an average of 14 years and that cigarettes kills up to half of their regular users! Here is the article I read with all the info…
    http://biovedawellness.com/2010/07/cigarettes-its-time-to-just-stop/

blog comments powered by Disqus