Acupuncture: A 2,000-year tradition of placebo effect?

Acupuncture has been — how shall we say? — one of the less ridiculed techniques of alternative medicine, at least in recent years. A body of evidence shows that it does indeed relieve pain, for many conditions. But a study released today suggests that acupuncture probably only works because patients believe that it will — and it’s the belief, not the procedure, that makes the difference.

In the new trial released today by the journal Arthritis Care & Research, 455 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned either to receive traditional Chinese acupuncture or to receive a sham treatment — a kind of mock acupuncture with needles inserted away from traditional acupuncture meridians, and with shallow needles designed to give very little of the stimulation that acupuncture provides. After six weeks of therapy, the two treatment groups showed comparable results in terms of arthritis symptoms, pain, and overall satisfaction. Furthermore, both groups reported less pain and fewer symptoms than a smaller group of patients who were still on a wait list, having not received treatment at all. In the end, it would seem that acupuncture did make people feel better — but that it’s not the treatment itself that matters.

What did matter in the study, however, was how optimistic the acupuncture providers appeared when they spoke to their patients. Practitioners were asked either to express neutral opinions about whether acupuncture would work for the patient, or to be positive about the expected results. Irrespective of whether patients received the real, traditional acupuncture treatment, those who were told to expect improvements were more likely to feel better afterward.

This study is by no means the first to suggest that pain relief from acupuncture is largely one big placebo effect. A trial last year found that simply poking a patient’s back with toothpicks provided similar pain relief to acupuncture. But this new study adds valuable information about the role of providers’ counsel — and, in particular, about how malleable a patient’s pain perception might be. The study also raises interesting ethical questions. Patients feel better simply by believing that they’ve had effective treatment. But should a doctor be enthusiastic about treatment, knowing that enthusiasm itself improves results? We like to think it’s better for our doctors to be honest with us.

Related Topics: Pain
  • Latest on Healthland

    Jamie Grill / Iconica / Getty Images

    A History of Kids and Sleep: Why They Never Get Enough

    Even a century ago, children were getting less sleep than experts recommended.

    Teen Pregnancy Rates Hit 40 Year LowCNN Health

    Caspar Benson / Getty Images

    Study: Overeating May Double the Risk of Memory Loss

    Passing on a second helping of dessert may not only maintain your waistline but also your memory.

  • jack919

    Another report which misconstrues what the trial shows. ‘Sham’ acupuncture is NOT sham i.e it is not a placebo. All this trial shows is that in OA of the knee the placement of the needles is unimportant for achieving the clinical effect i.e the nervous system is equally stimulated and pain relief achieved whether the points are in so called acupuncture points or not. This is not revelatory news. It’s about time science journalists started acquiring a bit more knowledge on the subjects they report on.

  • therantguy2010

    @jack919 – so, placing needles anywhere on the body magically help knee pain?

    It’s FAR more logical that this technique is psychological than anything else.

    PS It always amazes me that no matter what the science says there are people who will come up with ridiculous reasons why it’s wrong.

  • jack919

    @therantguy2010 – It’s not saying the science is wrong, it’s saying the conclusion is a misinterpretation of the results.
    Generalised analgesia can be produced via endorphin release from points not needled in the local area, segmental analgesia is produced by needling an area supplied by a common nerve pathway – which works by enkephalin release in the spinal chord, in that respect needling needs to be local but not point specific. I’m for a scientific approach to acupuncture, with scientific conclusions, not prejudiced ones – which is the essence of an unscientific approach.

  • absarokagrl

    So the author of this not so well written post cites one study. Have you checked the WHO and NIH’s lists of studies which have proven acupuncture works far better in many cases with things modern “science” can’t touch such as autoimmune disease, back pain, migraines, etc.?
    As far as the placebo effect goes, numerous studies have shown that with many “modern and oooh “scientific” medications, it can be 70 or more!
    Modern science is Newtonian; ie, linear. The new science, physics, etc. sees that life does not exist in a vacuum, is somewhat random and even more shocking, we are not machines.
    This is why OM is so effective. It treats the whole patient. And my dear bad author of this weightless piece; would you rather have a positive person as your healthcare practitioner? Or the modern “doctor” who spends five minutes with you, rushes you through and puts you on a heavy duty medication.
    I went through that until I found an acupuncturist. So forgive me if I’m a bit wary of this load of crap. Healing is not just about fixing a thing and giving someone a drug. That’s why integrative and alternative medicine is becoming so popular.
    And it will in the future, be used by more and more people with better results than the drug em cut em up squad. Thank God for my acupuncturist is all I have to say!

  • absarokagrl

    The dangers that lurk in my makeup bag, written by this author was far more of notice. Whew thanks for your really important and timely writing. LOL.

  • jenstate

    So what do we take away from the study, then? That it works or doesn’t? I’m interested more in how needles stimulate the nervous system. What, if any, implications does this study have on laser acupuncture which doesn’t require a needle, but rather a low level light (cold) laser passed over acupuncture points. You can read about it here… http://biovedawellness.com/holistic-services/stress-therapy/

  • http://rockingbodyrawfood.wordpress.com rockingbodyrawfood

    Seriously… TOOTHPICKS.

    I was skeptical at first as well… but have got such great results from acupuncture and this guy in portland http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buf1i9uErrY that I’ve now sent my entire family to him for some sort of treatment or another from back pain to sleep issues. They’ve ALL said how amazing they felt after a number of treatments.

  • yihaoj88

    6http://www.watchesky.comcheap watches!!!!

blog comments powered by Disqus