On a Trip to Mars, Astronauts’ Muscles Could Waste Away

SHAMIL ZHUMATOV/Reuters/Corbis
SHAMIL ZHUMATOV/Reuters/Corbis

They have treadmills and exercise bikes, but astronauts do not maintain muscle mass during long space voyages — a finding that suggests big problems on manned missions to other planets.

In the first-ever cellular analysis of astronaut muscles, nine members of the International Space Station crew offered up muscle biopsy samples from their calves. The crew gave one set of samples roughly 45 days before flight, and a second set on the day of their landing, after about six months in space. Researchers already knew that low gravity was bad for astronauts’ muscles — particularly for the legs, which support far lower loads in space than back in normal gravity on earth. But this is the first time that loss of muscle mass and function could be measured in cell tissue. The results weren’t pretty.

Muscle loss did vary with the amount of exercise done on board the space station — but all of the crew members had at least some loss of muscle function. Writing in the Journal of Physiology, the researchers, led by Robert Fitts of Wisconsin’s Marquette University, report that the astronaut with the least amount of damage showed no atrophy at all in one of the main calf muscles. But the astronaut still had “a modest 10% loss in fibre force.” Meanwhile, however, another astronaut lost fully 51% of fibre size and 70% of muscle force during the same study period.

The authors write:

An obvious conclusion is that the exercise countermeasures employed were incapable of providing the high-intensity needed to adequately protect fibre and muscle mass, and that the crew’s ability to perform strenuous exercise might be seriously compromised.

And this was after just six months in space. On a trip to Mars, for example, roughly 10 months away, astronauts might have trouble conducting even normal work on the planet’s surface, the study authors suggest. Astronauts might also lack the strength to make an emergency landing if needed (for example, when they come home). More high-resistance muscle training may be part of the answer, the researchers say.

Related Topics: astronauts, muscle loss, space, Diet & Fitness, Exercise
  • Latest on Healthland

    Getty Images

    A History of Kids and Sleep: Why They Never Get Enough

    Even a century ago, children were getting less sleep than experts recommended.

    Teen Pregnancy Rates Hit 40 Year LowCNN Health

    Caspar Benson / Getty Images

    Study: Overeating May Double the Risk of Memory Loss

    Passing on a second helping of dessert may not only maintain your waistline but also your memory.

  • http://spacerone.wordpress.com spacerone

    That detoriation of Astronauts’ bodies will only happen to Nasa’s Astronauts.
    Nasa was not interested in the technology of the Flying Saucer, which I discovered, patented and offered in 1980.
    A Shuttle that would take off without rockets but with VTOL?
    A Shuttle that with a constant acceleration /braking force of ONE G would be at the ISS in one hour?
    That ONE G force that would be comfortable to the Crew, who would feel as if they were just standing or sitting on Mother Earth?
    A Shuttle that dould fly to the Moon in a few hours and land there?
    A Shuttle that could fly to Mars within one day?
    A Shuttle that would have it’s inherent forcefield, that would protect Crew and Shuttle from collisions with Space Debris and Radiation?
    No way were they interested in that!.
    Then we had the Space Disasters.
    They decided to experiment with the circuitry, did not contact me first like I had strongly urged, used it the wrong way and instead of the Gravity Control/ Propulsion system, used the E-Bomb setting. They caused another disaster: The Big Black-out of 2003.
    Then the “experts” in Cleveland, Ohio advised Nasa that the system was unsuitable for Space Ventures.
    Nasas refused to pay my fee of $50 million.
    The invention had been evaluated by the Hudson Institute at $600 Billion, if the USA would have it before Russia.
    My US Patent Lawyer, Mr Farkas, predicted the Nobel Prize.
    Now that the cold war is over I have offered it to Russia and India.
    The 162 wannabee Astronauts will hardly getting a chance to go to the ISS, while the Roscosmos Cosmonauts will be whooping it all over Space.
    Even a One-, Ten- or Hundred Billion Dollar Heavy Lifter will be a joke compared with what Russia will be using.
    The USA will be a Has-Been as far as manned space ventures are concerned, compliments of Nasa.
    One little spin-off, which I did not describe in my patent is the tapping of energy out of the aether like a Flying Saucer does and what was probably used by Tesla for his Pierce Arrow Car in 1931.
    That system is worth a little bit more.
    It can be used to supply power to dwellings all over the globe and any type of vehicle, even aircraft.
    I am slowly working on it. I did not get the Nobel prize or my fee from Nasa. Neither did I get my $11 million for the E-Bomb wich I suggested to be used in the anti-anti-missile.
    US Patent , 4,095,162.
    Regards, Joseph Hiddink

  • yihaoj88

    4http://www.watchesky.comcheap watches!!!!

blog comments powered by Disqus