Using Videos to Help Diagnose Autism in Babies

The causes of autism are still unclear, but evidence is building that early intervention — before age 1 — may help mitigate or even prevent the developmental disorder from occurring in the first place. Making such early treatment more possible, researchers now report a promising new way of detecting autism in infants as young as 14 months.

Neuroscientist Karen Pierce, director of clinical research at the University of San Diego’s (UCSD) Autism Center of Excellence, found that autism can be predicted by identifying young babies who have a preference for repetitive geometric patterns. Pierce and her team studied 110 babies — some showed signs of autism spectrum disorders, some exhibited symptoms of other developmental abnormalities, and about half were developing normally. Babies sat on a parent’s lap and were presented with two 1-min. videos, played side by side. One video showed children stretching or dancing in a yoga class, while the other showed abstract geometric shapes changing in a repetitive pattern. Among the toddlers aged 14 months to 42 months, 100% of those who spent more than 50% of the time watching the geometric shapes were autistic.

See the videos below:

“Only the babies who were autistic — who either had the diagnosis of autism or became autistic — looked at the geometric pattern,” says Pierce. “So far this is the only marker for autism that is reliable.”

While the test succeeded in accurately picking up only the autistic children, it failed to identify all children with autism. That is, it missed some cases of autism among the study population, because some of the babies who were eventually diagnosed with the mental disorder did not prefer the geometric patterns early on. Overall, 40% of autistic babies in the study showed the preference. “This test is not going to catch every case, but if it does catch you, it’s never wrong,” says Pierce, whose study was published Monday in the Archives of General Psychiatry.

The findings build on earlier evidence suggesting that even at very early ages, autistic children tend to be attracted to nonsocial and repetitive stimuli, such as inanimate objects and patterns. In contrast, typically developing infants gravitate toward social stimuli, such as human voices and faces. Some studies have found that autistic children even prefer listening to a computer generated sound over a mother’s voice, and that they pay more attention to a picture of a toy than to a face.

Dr. Geraldine Dawson, chief scientific officer of the research and advocacy group Autism Speaks and a professor of psychiatry at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, says that changes in the brains of these infants occurring between 6 and 12 months may trigger the switch in behavior. Until that age, even autistic babies will engage with their parents and respond to human interaction; after this period, their responses start to change, and it’s not clear why.

Tests such as the one Pierce describes could provide a new way of identifying children who are on the autism trajectory as close to this critical period as possible. That’s important, says Pierce, because studies show that intervening early in the course of the disorder can minimize and potentially even prevent autism from occurring at all. At UCSD, doctors have begun treating infants as young as 15 months, and shown success in improving language and social skills in toddlers diagnosed with autism. “The brain is plastic when it’s young, really malleable and receptive to the environment,” Pierce says. “The idea with early intervention is that if you can get in there and train the child to try to get social behavior more in line with normal development, and language behavior more in line with normal development, then it will help to generate more of these normal connections and counteract autism.”

If the results of her study are replicated, Pierce envisions a simple version of her test being used in doctor’s offices. Physicians can present young babies with side-by-side videos and monitor which one captures the infant’s attention more. In current practice, doctors must tell parents who are concerned about their baby’s development to “wait and see” until about age 2, when toddlers’ language skills — and clearer symptoms of autism — should emerge. But with the new test, they may not have to wait that long. “The benefit of being able to detect infants at risk of autism very early is that we can engage the baby early on and draw their attention to the social world,” says Dawson. “In that way, we may even be able to alter the trajectory of brain development and change the outcome of whether they develop autism or not.” That would certainly be a welcome goal.

Related news:

Is Picky Eating an Early Sign of Autism?

Studies Link Infertility Treatments to Autism

For the First Time, a Census of Autistic Adults

Related Topics: Autism, child development, diagnosis, videos, Autism, Mental Health
  • Latest on Healthland

    MECKY / Getty Images

    Skip the Strained Peas. Let Babies Feed Themselves

    Skip the spoon-fed puree and let babies go straight to finger foods, a new study suggests.

    Doctors Cheating in Dermatology ExamsCNN Health

    PETER DAZELEY / GETTY IMAGES

    Like Father Like Son? Y Chromosome Linked to Heart Disease

    Dad may be credited with more than just your facial features. A new study suggests that heart disease risk may be passed from father to son.

  • amdachel

    I am amazed that TIME is so accepting of autism that we read in the lead sentence, “The causes of autism are still unclear” and we hear only about early diagnosing.

    One percent of U.S. children have autism. One percent of adults do not.

    How long will accept that no one knows why?

    Anne Dachel
    Media editor: Age of Autism

  • http://maurinemeleck.wordpress.com maurinemeleck

    This article is stating that fully half of the babies exhibited autistic behavior or some other type of developmental disability. That would mean 1 out of every 2 children will have these problems. But where is the alarm over this? It sounds as if you are asking how many children prefer chocolate to vanilla. This is absolutely terrifying. And what about all those children who are NOT bornw ith autism(perhaps only a genetic suseptability) and get regressive encephalopathy like the majority of children with autism today? Remem ber too that autims is not a mental disability per say, but a metabolical disease causing oxidative stress, immune dysfunction—etc. It’s isn’t simply a child born with the inability to make friends. Better check vaccines and other toxins.
    Maurine Meleck, South Carolina

  • jenstate

    It’s important to build neuropathways when your child is an infant. My aunt told me about an article when my daughter was an infant (6 years ago) about talking to your baby and looking them in the eye helping build those pathways. I really focused on that. My daughter has SPD but I think all the work I did with her as an infant and beyond helped to keep the diagnosis as SPD and NOT autism. Early intervention is certainly the key. Here are some resources that helped us help our daughter:
    http://www.brainbalancecenters.com – intervention/education
    http://www.sensoryplanet.com – forum for parents

    Good luck to all those trying to find the right interventions for their kids.

  • coronaradiata1

    Actually, the autism rate is 1% in adults (see study by England’s National Health Services, September 2009, also reported in Time). This means that even 60 years ago, the rate was 1% and it is not some new insult to the brain.

    This is an amazing study, and if it replicates, this simple method could be used to identify children who would benefit from early behavioral treatments; it is invaluable.

  • joshua2003

    The benefits of early intervention cannot be overstated. As a parent of a severely disabled child I can only say that I wish there was testing available for early detection. I am certain my son, who is now 8, would be functioning at a level higher than where he is at present.

  • paramom

    I am also a parent of a 3yr old boy who was found to be at risk for autism at the early age of 18 months old. I thank God every day for the early detection and the tools that were in place to help my baby. My son participated in this eye tracking study and it was amazing to see where his attention was captured. My son is a geometrical follower- course it’s not the only tool used when diagnosing for autism but I’m thankful for yet another tool that could be used in our Dr. office. This critical window to change his path in life was recognized early and so we took action. For us it paid off big time! I have nothing negative to say but a simple thank you from the bottom of my heart.

  • chapnalli

    Coroaradiata-
    That UK study finding adults is a terrible study. These people were not formally diagnosed with autism and they used a phone survey with questions like “do you prefer to go to the library or to a party?”…suggesting that everyone who likes to read is somewhere on the spectrum. They only used 20 of 50 questions to find spectrum issues which is completely inadequate; clearly they might have found a few cases of undiagnosed Asperger’s but there is no missing autism until adult hood.

  • chapnalli

    My son would not have been found in this study at 14 months or earlier. His regression began at 15 and 18 months with physical illness and reactions that led him down the road to loose all skills and language by 2 (he began EI at 21 months and diagnosed at 2). The mis-wiring came with immune dysfunction. I think that finding autism is an absolute must as early as possible but some of these studies only talk about the educational/developmental aspects and opportunities when they should be running full and complete metabolic, allergy, inflammation(neuro and GI), EEGs, and immune panels to begin treating the underlying comorbid conditions that end up mis-wiring the brain and continue to disrupt their immune systems and brain function. Autism is a medical condition, not a mental one and needs a full rehabilitative and habilitative, including individualized medical care, for a road to recovery just as a stroke victim would.

  • coronaradiata1

    chapnalli

    The UK study had two phases; they used the phone questionnaire as a screening tool in phase 1. Following the screening they evaluated over 200 individuals using the ADOS, in phase 2.

    I am not sure what you mean by your comment about Aspergers… the study did not differentiate the spectrum; if anything, it did not detect high-functioning individuals, and the rate may be higher than observed.

    It is important that we read all of the information, rather than reacting to what makes us feel emotional or to the information that supports our preconceptions. The UK study should be replicated, that would be more interesting, and informative, than dismissing it.

  • paramom

    chapnalli- I can see your passion and your knowledge is- of huge amounts… I’m a mom too of a child with ASD. This research is a good thing and most importantly it’s RESEARCH. Meaning, it’s only the start of early detection tools of autism. Some would say it’s actually a brain disease….. but each case of autism is different. Each child will display many different behaviors or medical symptoms. Plus autism can- in many cases piggy back with other disease. Your comments read defensive and I know how that feels. Every mom is responsible for doing the best research out there for our child. Each study is very specific and regulated by many forces- the objective has to be clean cut. I used to work in research and we can not include all ideas in only one study. Each study is a piece to add to the puzzle. Don’t we all want to find out more about autism? Research comes from people who take an interest in this disease and move forward adding their ideas. I remember working so hard on CF (cystic fibrosis) in my own research job and when I heard the parents act so thankful I got so happy! Moral was at an all time hight which made me the best researcher I could be- after all families were depending on my input. On the flip side of the coin when I heard the media or negative comments it really hurt my feelings! I’m human. Please remember how important research is to the autism community. Parents aren’t the professionals (even though sometimes I think I am) lol! The chain of command is not going to change-working together and understanding how research works (in the United States) is key to understanding how all of us can add to the autism pile of information.

blog comments powered by Disqus