Declines in U.S. Smoking Rates Remain Stalled at 20%

REUTERS/JP Moczulski
REUTERS/JP Moczulski
An office worker enjoys a cigarette in downtown Toronto February 19, 2007. Canada's three major tobacco companies' legal challenge to a government ban on sponsorship and advertising will be heard Monday in the Supreme Court of Canada. REUTERS/J.P. Moczulski (CANADA)

For the fifth year in a row, the decline in smoking rates among adult Americans remains stalled. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 20% of adults still smoke, a figure that hasn’t changed since 2005.

The latest data on tobacco use reveals that more men than women currently light up, and that poverty and lower educational attainment are associated with greater cigarette use.

But even more disturbing, says Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the CDC, is the data on secondhand-smoke exposure. The agency’s Vital Signs report, released Tuesday, found that 88 million nonsmokers, or 40% of all nonsmokers in the U.S., are exposed to tobacco smoke. While this represents a decline from the 52.5% exposed during the 1999-2000 period, “40% is still too high,” Frieden told reporters during a telebriefing. “Secondhand smoke kills, and there is no safe level of secondhand smoke exposure.” Studies have recently found that even minimal exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke can alter genes in cells in the airway, which may predispose them to become cancerous.

Most secondhand smoke exposure is now occurring in the home, which has become the last bastion for smokers after extensive bans on lighting up have cleared the air in restaurants, airplanes, shopping malls and other public places. That’s especially troubling since home is where children spend most of their time, and are now encountering their biggest dose of tobacco smoke. In the report, scientists found that 98% of children living in a home with a parent who smoked showed levels of cotinine, a tobacco toxin, in their blood.

The data, said Frieden, points out that antismoking efforts need to be reactivated in areas where they are faltering, and that everyone needs to be reminded of the dangers of tobacco smoke, even for nonsmokers. The tobacco industry, he said, is finding ways to bypass stricter regulations on tobacco advertisements, by creating new products that appeal to younger smokers, but he noted that states that invested in aggressive antismoking programs saw significant declines in smoking and lung cancer incidence as a result. In California, for example, smoking rates dropped by 40% from 1998 to 2006, and lung cancer cases in the state have been falling four times faster than in the rest of the country.

The national smoking rate of 20% is still off the government’s Healthy People 2010  goal of a less than 12% rate, and with tobacco-related health care costs estimated at $193 billion, said Frieden, “this is a clarion call that there is no time like the present to quit.”

Related Topics: Cancer, cotinine, lung cancer, second hand smoke, smoking, Tobacco, Medicine, Tobacco
  • Latest on Healthland

    Jeff Kravitz / FilmMagic / Getty Images

    Whitney Houston’s Death: Hallmarks of a Battle Against Addiction and Overdose

    The cause of the legendary singer’s death on Saturday is still unknown, but it bears the signs of overdose.

    Teen Pregnancy Rates Hit 40 Year LowCNN Health

    Getty Images

    A History of Kids and Sleep: Why They Never Get Enough

    Even a century ago, children were getting less sleep than experts recommended.

  • thefxr

    The non biased observer, can only form a single conclusion; That the focus on tobacco smoke, now believed by many to be far more dangerous than diesel exhaust, which defies common sense, has significantly redefined public perceptions of the many groups involved.

    The term “medical charity” is much more consistently associated with the controls of vice, morality and cult worship, than they are to their stated claims “in search of cures” which would of course render their moralizing arguments mutt.

    The anti-saloon league would be proud of the lot of them, so would the gangsters, who they made rich with paternalism and the promotions of protection rackets.

  • audreysilk

    “No safe level” is a political, not scientific statement. Unless tobacco smoke is the one thing that defies all, then humankind should have ceased to exist with the advent of fire, exposure to the sun, and drinking water that contains arsenic. Then to tie it to a study that was concocted to support an agenda is to insult intelligence. The human body responds to ALL outside stimuli! Eat a big breakfast, have road rage, watch a fireworks display, stand at a barbeque, and there will be changes in molecular structures that return to “nomal” once the stimuli has passed! That’s what the body does! It instantly “repairs” itself. The study referred to says it only observed a change and did not follow subjects for long-term effects. And that’s a study to pin policy on??!! Rather, it’s an invention to push an agenda.

    To quote Matt Patterson of Green Watch (though on another scientific debate): “Such behavior is perhaps to be expected from politicians and government functionaries. From scientists, it’s a travesty.
    In the end, grievous harm will have been done not just to individual scientists’ reputations, but to the once-sterling reputation of science itself. For that, we will all suffer.”

    Founder, NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment (C.L.A.S.H.)

  • harleyrider2011

    For the fifth year in a row, the decline in smoking rates among adult Americans remains stalled. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 20% of adults still smoke, a figure that hasn’t changed since 2005

    How can anyone be quitting when the smoking rates havent gone down one bit since all this heavy handed smoking bans started in 2007 across the nation…….even high taxes didnt work……..even scare tactics didnt work,like the genetic junk science you have tossed out here in this story……Its time to spend those tobacco control dollars on REAL SCIENCE and repair the damage done to science with all the PSUEDO-SCIENCE thats been created over the last 20 years by tobacco control…….game over it didnt work just like last time.

    1901: REGULATION: Strong anti-cigarette activity in 43 of the 45 states. “Only Wyoming and Louisiana had paid no attention to the cigarette controversy, while the other forty-three states either already had anti-cigarette laws on the books or were considering new or tougher anti-cigarette laws, or were the scenes of heavy anti- cigarette activity” (Dillow, 1981:10).

    1917: SMOKEFREE: Tobacco control laws have fallen, including smoking bans in numerous cities, and the states of Arkansas, Iowa, Idaho and Tennessee.

  • anono1955

    Bunch of bought off boomer busybodies bashing beings on barstools. Back off, Bums! Your balderdash and BS are are bummer.
    By the way, the CDC does not bother returning phone calls, specifically the Media Department, which hosted the “News Conference”. News Conference? What a joke.
    Dissemination of Nicotine Replacement Propaganda Department more like! Heil, you propagandists!
    Science flew out the window with common sense!

  • anono1955

    Dr Freiden,
    Do you have people in every home? Where on earth do you people come up with these nutty numbers? You don’t even KNOW how many people smoke or where. Your calling guessing “SCIENCE” is insulting to scientists, and is actually slowing down finding a cure for anything! Cut the crap and get to the chase. You are selling nicotine replacement for Johnson and Johnson, because you get donations from their “philanthropic arm” the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Check the “QUITLINE”. Within a minute of your free advice you are told you are an addict and you MUST have Nicoderm, Nicorette, Nicotrol, or Nicoderm CQ (all J&J products) to be cured.

blog comments powered by Disqus