Do Sports Products Really Enhance Your Workout? Maybe Not

  • Share
  • Read Later
Tyler Stableford / Getty Images

Do sports drinks really give your workout an extra edge? A recent study of the performance-enhancing claims of more than 100 fitness products says probably not. In fact, of the hundreds of such claims identified in product advertisements and websites, researchers couldn’t find a single one that was backed by solid scientific evidence.

For the study, researchers at the University of Oxford looked at advertisements for sports drinks, oral supplements, footwear, clothing and fitness devices like wristbands and compression sleeves in 100 general interest magazines and the top 10 sport and fitness magazines in the U.K. and the U.S. The team also searched the websites of any product making claims to enhance athletic performance or improve recovery, seeking references for scientific studies supporting these claims.

The researchers found 235 magazine ads for sports products, of which 54 made claims to improve performance or recovery. Only three products provided references; many simply offered celebrity athlete endorsement instead. The 53 websites the researchers examined contained 431 performance-enhancing claims for 104 products, with a total of 146 references. More than half of the sites provided no references at all.

(SPECIAL: 5 Common Mistakes You’re Making at the Gym)

The researchers then contacted 42 companies for references that couldn’t otherwise be found, and heard back from 16, nine of which offered additional material. Among the companies that didn’t provide usable references, two, Panache and New Balance, said they were unwilling to share their research; one, Nike, offered a video of its product in use and said it was “sufficient”; and one, Merrell, pointed to the work of a researcher but didn’t say whether the company had any research on its actual product.

After sifting through the available references, the researchers discarded half for being unfit for scientific appraisal; they pointed to books without clinical studies, nonexistent studies, conference abstracts or online surveys without data, or nonhuman studies, such as a study of the effects of different diets on rat metabolism published in 1930. Of the 74 studies that could be evaluated, the team found that only three were of high quality and low risk for bias. Notably, all three reported no significant effects of the intervention studied.

Victor Katch, a professor of kinesiology at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor who was not affiliated with the current research but studies the validity of fitness products, says the findings aren’t surprising. “We are in a culture where testimonial evidence and talking heads have a lot of power and sway, especially in areas where people have little knowledge,” he says. “People want to do something about their fitness and wellness and they’re willing to give products a chance. Almost every week there’s a new diet or fitness book out, and they’re all nonsense.”

(MORE: Teens Don’t Need Energy or Sports Drinks, Pediatricians Say)

The marketing of sports products has become a multibillion dollar industry, the authors note, and each year consumers increasingly buy into the claims of performance-enhancing products, especially so-called energy drinks. But the “current evidence is not of sufficient quality to inform the public about the benefits and harms of sports products,” the authors write.

To be fair, there may yet be evidence, not included in the new study published in the journal BMJ Open, that backs some of the products’ claims. The authors also acknowledge that while they attempted to include a representative sample of products in their study, it’s possible that the ones they analyzed were “on the worst end of the spectrum.” The scientists note further that they didn’t give manufacturers much time to respond to their requests for more information.

But, by and large, many experts in the field agree that the evidence shoring up sports product claims is thin. “There is a need to improve the quality of the research conducted in this area and its reporting, and a move towards using systematic review evidence across the board for decision-making,” the authors conclude.

(MORE: What a Workout! Women Report That Exercise Triggers Orgasm)

Unfortunately, many manufacturers are unwilling to put in the time, money or effort required for solid research, says Katch. “[As experts in the field], we have a responsibility to offer proper information to the public. If we don’t, no one will. It’s very unregulated,” he says.

For consumers left wondering which fitness products are worth the money and which aren’t, the answer is that there isn’t enough evidence to say. But for the average American, it’s less important to try to boost performance than it is to just get moving, says Katch. If you want to know whether your fancy running shoes will help shave seconds from your time, you’ll need to get out there and hit the pavement.

12 comments
famulla5
famulla5

IN USA  President Obama offered his support Tuesday for the F.B.I.'s handling of a Russian intelligence tip about a suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings, even as the nation’s intelligence chief announced a review of whether more could have been done to thwart the attack.

Mr. Obama rejected criticism that the Federal Bureau of Investigation did not do enough when the Russian government asked it to investigate one of the suspects, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, in 2011. The F.B.I. interviewed Mr. Tsarnaev at the time but found no evidence that he was involved in radical activities that represented a threat to the United States.

“"It’s not as if the F.B.I. did nothing,” Mr. Obama said at his first news conference since Mr. Tsarnaev and his brother, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, were accused of setting off bombs at the marathon on April 15. “They not only investigated the older brother; they interviewed the older brother. They concluded that there were no signs that he was engaging in extremist activity.”

He added: “Based on what I’ve seen so far, the F.B.I. performed its duties. Department of Homeland Security did what it was supposed to be doing. But this is hard stuff.”

In response to the Boston bombing, the office of James R. Clapper Jr., who as the director of national intelligence oversees the country’s 17 intelligence agencies, said a review will look at how the F.B.I. and Central Intelligence Agency handled the Russian tip and its aftermath. Mr. Obama and law enforcement officials described the action as standard procedure.  I thank you FirozaliA.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

The military, over the last 70 years, has almost destroyed America and the US economy while doing nothing for the citizens but robbing them. Today the US does not have a manned space flight program. You may ask why, in one sentence, the space shuttle destroyed our manned program. The reason it was destroyed is because the space shuttle was secretly developed primarly for the military to launch large spy satalites. As a second use to cover its true reason was to build a poorly designed space station which is to be decomminissioned in 2015 and be allowed to fall back to earth. Another trillion dollars relegated to the trash heap of history. The F-22 and the F-35 are also wasting trillions of dollars of taxpayers money. Why? What country has anything even close to the performance of the 20 year old FA-18 or the 7 year old F-22? Think about this, the 30 year old F-16 can still out fly most aircraft around the world. Why are trillions upon trillions being put in these useless weapons systems. It seems our military leaders are still living in the Cold War era. The Cold War destroyed the USSR and that mentality is well into destroying America. We have no state enamies that can harm us. Russia is not interested in anything but business and oil profit. China owns more of the US debt than any other country so why would they want to attack us, add to that 90% of these weapon systems can not protect America against terrorist. Most will end up in a scrap heap in twenty years. Enough is enough.  I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

Before a special session was called Sunday for the Washington Legislature to finish such important tasks as setting the state’s two-year operating budget, legislative leaders and Gov. Jay Inslee seemed to agree on one thing: It would cost taxpayers $11,000 a day. If history is any guide, that estimate could be high. Last year’s special session didn’t cost that much, even though pay and per diem schedules suggested it might. And that’s not an extra cost to taxpayers, administrators for the Senate and House of Representatives said Monday. The cost of a special session is always absorbed in their existing budgets; they don’t get extra money, although they may have to forgo something else. “It’s really hard to predict the cost of a special session,” said Bernard Dean, chief deputy clerk of the House. The Legislature has needed a special session every year since 2010, and about half the years since 2000. Sometimes, they’ve needed more than the 30 days set by the state constitution for such a legislative overtime period. The cost of the 2011 special session was about $10,700 a day, close to the estimate being used by Inslee and Senate Republicans as the regular session ran out of time. Last year’s special session was slightly cheaper at $9,400 per day. That is a lot of cask paid I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

Deadly bombings hit the center of the Syrian capital, Damascus, and a major Syria border crossing into Turkey on Tuesday as President Obama strongly suggested that he would not be rushed into military entanglements in the Syria conflict, where evidence of chemical weapons use has raised the possibility of an American intervention.

The blasts in Syria, which killed at least 13 people in Damascus and at least five at the Bab al-Hawa crossing in northern Syria, came a day after an attempted assassination of Syria’s prime minister in central Damascus from a bomb aimed at his motorcade. The prime minister, Wael Nader al-Halqi, survived the attack but at least five others including a bodyguard were killed, Syria’s state news media reported.

In Washington, Mr. Obama told reporters at a wide-ranging news conference that despite an American intelligence assessment last week that there was evidence that chemical weapons had been used in Syria, the evidence had not yet surpassed his “red line” for a change of American strategy regarding the conflict, in which President Bashar al-Assad is fighting to stay in power against an increasingly violent insurgency.

“We don’t know how they were used, when they were used, who used them; we don’t have chain of custody that establishes what exactly happened,” Mr. Obama said. “And when I am making decisions about America’s national security and the potential for taking additional action in response to chemical weapon use, I’ve got to make sure I’ve got the facts.”

If investigations prove that the Syrian government had used chemical weapons in the conflict, Mr. Obama said, “we would have to rethink the range of options that are available to us.” I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA


famulla5
famulla5

We have to cause growth at the very lowest level, which doesn't cause a.) unrest (readily stirred up by labour) or b.) more money borrowing (by the government, or individuals from banks) - I know people who are being "chased" off benefits that they have been claiming for years (30 in some cases) but they find the prospect of returning accounting and that side of business so off putting - if they could just state, "I earned less thant X" this year, they would be happy and the government would not have to keep them except for their rent which they could have paid till they earned up  to Y amount.
Until people of the UK are able to live their lives in this most basic way without the hideous tax system which shackles us all - all the potential of these people can never be realised.

PAYE and the rest of the tax system was set up in an era when there were huge factories and "jobs for life" because we had control over a British empire that allowed us to spend more than we earned, and half of that time the rest of the world was recovering from being flattened by war and we were in joint control of the purse strings with the US - we gave ourselves advantages over the losers that have since been ironed out over time and naturally we find we can't compete - we have to end the tax system as it stands and implement a more casual system (like many countries) - and stop spending peoples' money on everything pointless  from doggy poop bags to trying to get people to stop eating too much.

Also, why are people so interested in making a business (a bank) lend money that it doesn't want to lend  because its not viable - they're dammed if they do and dammed if they don't. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA Will this avoid the triple AAAs and  deep by UK 

famulla5
famulla5

Vengeance has always been our motto At least four career officials at the State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency have retained lawyers or are in the process of doing so, as they prepare to provide sensitive information about the Benghazi attacks to Congress, Fox News has learned. Victoria Toensing, a former Justice Department official and Republican counsel to the Senate Intelligence Committee, is now representing one of the State Department employees. She told Fox News her client and some of the others, who consider themselves whistle-blowers, have been threatened by unnamed Obama administration officials. “I'm not talking generally, I'm talking specifically about Benghazi – that people have been threatened,” Toensing said in an interview Monday. “And not just the State Department. People have been threatened at the CIA.” Toensing declined to name her client. She also refused to say whether the individual was on the ground in Benghazi on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, when terrorist attacks on two U.S. installations in the Libyan city killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA. Secure from danger, harm, or evil. 2. Free from danger or injury; unhurt: safe and sound. 3. Free from risk; sure: a safe bet.

jegfitness
jegfitness

I think saying that sports drinks don't do anything for athletes is just asinine.  They don't claim to make a person jump higher or run faster, they claim to hydrate and bring electrolytes into a persons system.  If you have any type of nutritional background you would know that this is true.    If a person prepares for an event with proper nutrition, hydration and carbo-loading they do not need Gatorade or Power Aid, unless they are running some type of marathon where all stores are just depleted.  In the same breath, not everyone follows a proper diet and most athletes don't hydrate properly.  To say if a sports drink is necessary or not necessary is based on an individual basis.   

Jordan Meeter
Jordan Meeter

The only legitimate gym supplement is steroids.

Mishfit
Mishfit

One product that lives up to its advertising are SRC recovery shorts. With each consignment of compression fabric tested by CSIRO making them the best compression wear available. Both my clients and myself feel a huge improvement in performance with the support they give. Love them!

Mishfit
Mishfit

One product that certainly enhances performance is SRC recovery wear. Compression garments that are second to none with each consignment of fabric tested by CSIO to make sure it really does what it says it does. It has impressed me and my clients!

WTF
WTF

Thank you for writing this, and pointing out the need for valid data... It is so easy to get carried away by BS! 

Firozali A.Mulla
Firozali A.Mulla

To day's

economy demands less health and more risk but cash always wins At times we

complain to our wives where the cash is going Four hundred million more plastic

bags were handed out by supermarkets last year as the campaign to reduce their

use went backwards, official figures from the waste reduction body Wrap showed today.

Shoppers in the UK used 7.96 billion single-use bags in 2011, a rise of 5.4 per

cent on the previous year - with each person taking 10 throwaway carriers a month.

Plastic bag use rose steeply across most of the UK but in Wales, which

introduced a 5p charge per bag last October, it fell by 22 per cent. In

England, which has ruled out a similar charge, the number of bags rose by 7.5

per cent and in Northern Ireland, where a levy will come into force next year,

the spike was 8.1 per cent. There was a 0.3 per cent dip in Scotland, which

launched a consultation into introducing a minimum 5p levy last week. The

number of plastic bags in the UK has now increased for two years in a row,

following a 4 per cent jump – the first rise in five years - to 7.56 billion in

2010.However since 2006, when publicity highlighted the damage done by

discarded bags to the countryside and seas, the annual number given out by supermarkets

has fallen by 35 per cent. Over the same period supermarkets have thinner bags,

halving the amount of virgin polymer used in the manufacture of all carrier

bags including re-usable ‘bags for life’.The British Retail Consortium said the

rise was down to changing habits in grocery shopping, with hard-up families

doing several small shops a week instead of one big trip, and switching from

the car to public transport. Both factors meant they were less likely to take

reusable bags, the organisation suggested. Friends of the Earth campaigner

Julian Kirby said: “A plastic bag tax in England is long overdue to tackle this

appalling waste and reduce the mess unwanted bags make in our open spaces.“But

plastic bags are just the tip of the iceberg – the Government must develop a

comprehensive strategy to tackle food waste, appliances that break early and

the postcode lottery that means what’s recyclable in one area isn’t in

another.” I agree with this as I see the plastic bottles on the streets . As

the car crashes it the cap comes out and , if you are on the way, make sure you

are insured as these are becoming VERY dangerous .The biggest problems is the

garbage collectors care little about this . More plastic is thrown in the

garbage now then any time before. To some amazement what no one knows is  Although a staple of the American diet,

butter came under a great deal of scrutiny when its high levels of saturated

fat were associated with increased heart disease risk. Many people accepted the

demise of butter in stride, ruing the loss of its savoury flavour but agreeing

that its effect on the heart might be too high a price to pay. They dutifully

switched to margarine, as researchers and nutritionists suggested. Then the

hazards of margarine came to light. Its high levels of trans fats packed a

double whammy for heart disease by raising levels of LDL (bad cholesterol) and

lowering levels of HDL (good cholesterol). Many people felt betrayed or duped.

The truth is, there never was any good evidence that using margarine instead of

butter cut the chances of having a heart attack or developing heart disease.

Making the switch was a well-intentioned guess, given that margarine had less

saturated fat than butter, but it overlooked the dangers of trans fats. Today

the butter-versus-margarine issue is really a false one. From the standpoint of

heart disease, butter is on the list of foods to use sparingly mostly because

it is high in saturated fat, which aggressively increases levels of LDL.

Margarines, though, aren’t so easy to classify. The older stick margarines that

are still widely sold are high in trans fats, and are worse for you than

butter. Some of the newer margarines that are low in saturated fat, high in

unsaturated fat, and free of trans fats are fine as long as you don’t use too

much (they are still rich in calories).You can quickly compare the health value

of spreads (including butter and margarine) simply by looking at the nutrition

labels on these products. The FDA now requires nutrition labels to include

information about both saturated fats and trans fats. Your goal is to limit

intake of saturated fats and to avoid trans fats altogether. Healthier

alternatives to butter or margarine include olive oil and other vegetable

oil–based spreads, which contain beneficial mono- and polyunsaturated fats.

Next time you tear into a warm loaf of bread or roll, consider dipping it in

olive oil rather than coating it in butter. If you're trying to lower your

cholesterol, stanol-based spreads (for example, Benecol and Take Control) are

even better, since regular use can help lower LDL cholesterol levels. Margarine

is made from plastic MARGARINE, when first produced, is a grey, smelly plastic.

It needs ... a grey, smelly grease. Yet many health ...There you are you eating

plastic? Is that why we need more plastic bottles? The only reason people but

this instead of butter is butter is high in cholesterol and it is priced expensive

I thank you Firozali A.Mulla