The Truth About Antioxidants

  • Share
  • Read Later
157112143
Getty Images

A new report shows antioxidants do not boost fertility as previously thought. It’s not the first study to take the shine off the popular agents, which many people take in supplement form.

In a review published in the Cochrane Library, researchers found that antioxidants did not increase women’s chances of conceiving or having a baby, which wasn’t surprising, given that the quality of trials linking fertility and antioxidant supplements, say the scientists, was low. But the findings did contradict earlier studies that found partners of men who took antioxidant supplements were more likely to conceive than those who took placebo. And the review is only the latest to raise doubts about the health benefits of antioxidants, which have been touted as potent cancer-fighters and anti-aging allies. Once present only in foods such as berries, carrots, peppers and tomatoes, antioxidants are now added to flavored water and other products to earn a “high in antioxidants” label. But are the benefits of antioxidants overhyped?

(MORE: The Supernut: Walnuts Pack a Powerful Dose of Antioxidants)

Antioxidants entered the public’s nutritional vocabulary in the 1990s, when researchers began to understand how free radical damage, caused by oxygen-based reactions, contributed to chronic diseases from aging to vision loss and cancer. Free radicals are generated as cells use oxygen to break down food for energy, and they can cause cell damage by attaching to other molecules and prompting cells to grow abnormally or by interfering with normal cell functions, including those in the brain. Free radicals are a natural byproduct of the body’s metabolism, but in most cases, naturally occurring antioxidants stabilize them and keep the damage to a minimum.

When that balance is disturbed, however — and anything from exposure to pollutants to cigarette smoke to things you eat can shift this equilibrium — the production of free radicals may outrun the body’s ability to control them. That’s why antioxidants became a popular weapon in the fight for well-being — if the body needs more antioxidants, it couldn’t hurt to supply them in supplement form, right?

(MORE: Popcorn Is Packed With Antioxidants)

The problem is, antioxidants come in a range of forms — from vitamins like vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta-carotene, as well as minerals like manganese and selenium. Then there are the other carotenoids and flavonoids and polyphenols. And, not surprisingly, each can have a different effect on the cells of the body. In recent years, for example, scientists reported that beta-carotene, instead of lowering cancer rates, actually increased risk of dying from lung cancer or heart disease among a group of smokers. In a recent article published in the journal Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, toxicology researchers from Maastricht University in the Netherlands highlighted the all-or-nothing beliefs about antioxidants, noting that it’s likely that the agents have some health benefits, if used and dispensed in the proper doses. They write:

For several decades, we have noticed that the antioxidant pendulum appears to swing vigorously from ‘only healthy’ to ‘extremely toxic’, and from ‘natural antioxidants are best’ to ‘antioxidants cannot act’. The squabbling parties do not seem to listen to counter-arguments. Erroneous statements are not corrected, and thus the pendulum oscillates to the extremes. This inevitably hampers research in the field and confuses both scientists and consumers. As a consequence, we might fail to spot opportunities for which antioxidants may aid in optimizing health.

So what does the research say about what antioxidants can, and cannot do to improve your health?

All antioxidants are not equal: Because antioxidants come in many different types, it makes sense that you consume a variety of antioxidant-rich fruits of vegetables, so that you can benefit from the full range of benefits they provide. Together, the mix is good for your health. For instance, certain antioxidants may play a greater role in preventing certain diseases, such as cancers, while others are better at combating neurodegenerative conditions.

In a study of Dutch people published in the journal Neurology in February, researchers were disappointed to find no correlation between antioxidant-rich diets and cognitive decline or stroke, but, as Elizabeth Devore, an instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston and one of the study authors, told HealthDay, “There are thousands of antioxidants in the diet, and some of them may have more antioxidant power.”

Most people don’t get enough antioxidants from naturally occurring sources: For most healthy adults, the antioxidants contained in a healthy diet rich in fruits and vegetables would be enough to combat most of the free radical damage occurring in their bodies. But, says Jeffrey Blumberg, director of the antioxidants research laboratory and professor of nutrition at Tufts University, most people fall far short of meeting recommended daily intakes for vitamins like C and E. The average adult should be consuming 15 mg of vitamin E daily, but more than 90% of people fail to eat that amount, and most people only get about half the recommended dose from their diet. “That’s a huge shortfall. That doesn’t mean they couldn’t, but they aren’t. Vitamin C is another shortfall nutrient, or a nutrient of concern. Vitamin C and E are low in the typical American diet. With vitamin C, women require 75 mg a day and men 90 mg per day; that’s really low. Have a glass of orange juice and you have practically met your entire requirement for the day. It is so easy to meet your vitamin C requirements. It’s shocking to me that people aren’t,” says Blumberg.

But more isn’t necessarily better — it’s about getting just the right amount to balance the free radical activity in the body. And that’s why nutritionists don’t recommend loading up on supplements to make up for what you can’t eat daily; it’s not clear how safe getting too much of certain antioxidants are (some, like beta carotene, can increase risk of premature death), and it’s easy to overdo a nutrient if you’re taking supplements.

Be skeptical of claims that antioxidants extend your life (or that they can kill you): “Are the claims surrounding antioxidants a bit overblown? Well yes, if it says antioxidants will prevent Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, heart disease, eye diseases, kidney disease and everything, then yes, it is a little overblown,” says Blumberg. “Any clearly definitive, absolute claim is overblown.”

There are legitimate claims, however, that you should discuss with your doctor. For example, there is evidence that vitamins E and C may help reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration, the leading cause of blindness in older adults, and protect against age-related eye damage.

There is no “superfruit”: There is no evidence that antioxidants can keep most chronic diseases at bay, but the food and beverage industry continues to make claims that super fruits like pomegranate or pitaya can minimize oxidative damage. But “superfruit” is a marketing term that is not recognized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) as conveying any scientifically supported nutritional benefits.

And what about processed snacks and beverages that boast high levels of antioxidants? “The challenge here is that since consumers understand that by and large antioxidants are good for you, they are going to use that as a hook to sell you their products,” says Blumberg. “If they are formulated into a product that you don’t necessarily think of as particularly healthy, like soda pop, then be skeptical. I would argue even if they provided 100% of the daily value of vitamin C inside a sugar-sweetened beverage, it’s probably not the best source to get it from.”

(MORE: In Search of…The Superfruit)

Everything in moderation: We can all benefit from some antioxidants — but these should come from the diet, where it’s likely to be in the right variety and the right amounts. And it’s more important to get certain ones, such as vitamins C and E, than some of the thousands of phytochemicals and carotenoids that present in various foods. “The central ones, vitamin C, vitamin E, zinc–are essential. If you don’t get them, in extreme [cases], you can develop a deficiency problem. But there are lots of other basic research and human studies that suggest if you get an adequate amount, you promote health and may reduce your risk for some age-related chronic diseases,” says Blumberg. As with most things involving our health, getting the dose just right is the key.

28 comments
AqibArif
AqibArif

I was extremely happy when I first saw this module as I thought I was finally able to showcase lots of content on my frontpage. In essense this is ok for the default functionality however, it is nearly impossible and extremely tedious and complicated to customize. <a href="http://www.theedmontonpainter.com">Edmonton Painting</a>


 

zeeshantapra
zeeshantapra

There are several factors that make the Electronic Cigarette is the best way for smokers to keep their habits, fun gesture and taste of tobacco without the evils and dangers of ingesting really harmful toxic substances body. The Electronic Cigarette also allows people who want to quit smoking gradually wean the "normal" cigarette but also not interfere with their environment odor of tobacco and cigar..     Cigarette electronique

Rin_
Rin_

The truth about antioxidants? They tested a few of the best known ones, each of which there are many forms. Those ones didn't do anything. 


In men the results have been much, much better. Perhaps this is because men turnover their fish far faster than women turn over their eggs. As such, any changes are going to happen quicker. Or something like that.

baboseni
baboseni

If truly this is supported by Research, then MODERATION is the watchword here.

PieHoleBlogger
PieHoleBlogger

Too much artificial anti-oxident power (generally only in large amounts provided by supplements) can actually upset the balance of free radicals in the body where there are too few free radicals. Free radicals are still important for normal functioning of the immune system and other processes.

mentxudavinci1
mentxudavinci1

Good post Alexandra! I especially liked the end. I think that antioxidants can improve health, especially if we eat them naturally,  in the form of fruits and vegetables and better if they are organic. Common sense tells me that  insecticide in a tomato is not a good election!

http://armoniacorporal.es/

GeneErb
GeneErb

Well done Alexander Sifferlin!

mblockhart
mblockhart

In discussing vitamins and antioxidants, nuitritionists always talk about the "Recommended Daily Allowance."  Problem is that for a particular person at a certain age and with certain health issues that may not be the "Optimum Dosage"  Also, nutritionists and authors such as this one often overlook the fact that people restricting their calories such as those on diets and the elderly who tend to eat less may not be getting an optimum dosage of antioxidants that might do them some good.  That's why the recommendation just to get your antioxidants from food alone seems to be wrong.  What is needed is continued study and information as to which substances are of benefit (or harm) for what condition, as this article does do.

HeatherGraves
HeatherGraves

My biggest health concern of all time is, why do sooo many people have bad eyes?

TomHennessy
TomHennessy

There are many different antioxidants , iron chelating antioxidants , substances which bind up iron and allow the body to excrete iron , being the best. Unless one removes this iron , all other antioxidants cannot do their work , be it quenching oxidation or performing other duties , because they were destroyed by the iron induced oxidation.

"Pathophysiology of iron-induced compromised fertility in women"

Giving someone antioxidants is just attempting to treat the cause , not trying to remove it , unless , one uses specific antioxidants.

"Endometriosis" "The use of iron-binding molecules might form the basis of future treatment for the condition"

valentine.godoflove
valentine.godoflove

HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH PSEUDO SCEINTISTS......FIRST.......COFFEE WAS BAD FOR YOU......THEN .....DECADES LATER.......COFFEE IS GOOD FOR YOU.......TODAY......ANTI OCCODANTS ARE NOT GOOD.......BEFORE....THEY ARE GREAT.......

STALIN WOULD HAVE SENT HIS NKVD AND HAD THESE BOGUS SCIENTISTS SHOT.....LOL.....

VALENTINE, COMEDIAN

curriek679
curriek679

I'm sorry, but I'm always wary of any Time article that starts with the words "The Truth About . . . "

se123
se123

truth is nobody knows their ass from their elbow.  One day this is good, one day this is not so good.  There is no truth, only opinion.  Fruit is good for you, eat it in moderation with exercise for an optimum healthy diet.  This goes for just about everything

Jeffus
Jeffus

Antioxidants or any other healthy food or food type, may not improve any bodily function, but good balanced nutrition will improve all. Why focus on the trees when we need to focus on the forest?

rfarivar
rfarivar

anti-oxydants or anything else, what is overhyped or overinvested in qua belief is bound to be untrue, how else can it be ?

What is more "miracles" depend largely on the point of view of the believer....

aliberaldoseofskepticism
aliberaldoseofskepticism

@mblockhart The RDAs are based on a particular study. Basically they take what is needed for 90% of men, what is needed for 90% of women, and average those two figures. (Most of the time men need slightly more of something because men are bigger. However, women need more iron, due to menstruation.)

TomHennessy
TomHennessy

Man is a herbivore eating meat. This causes an increased level of iron in the body , this iron deposits causing various diseases , macular degeneration for one , diabetic blindness , glaucoma , etc. The underlying cause of it all is the fact man is a herbivore eating meat which leads to a high oxidation / rust , state , and oxidation destroys antioxidants , which is why everyone believes we need to take anti-oxidants.

"Maculas affected by age-related macular degeneration contain increased chelatable iron" "Calcium/Iron Supplementation and Glaucoma Linked" "Higher intakes of vitamin C or the combined intake of antioxidants had
long-term protective associations against development of nuclear cataract" "In proliferative diabetic retinopathy the level of iron increases"

aliberaldoseofskepticism
aliberaldoseofskepticism

@se123 I would say fruits and vegetables are good for you. Antioxidant supplements, not so much. But we've known giving beta-carotene supplements to smokers is slightly positively correlated to incidence of lung cancer for years now; it was amazing because it was the exact opposite of what the authors expected.

TomHennessy
TomHennessy

"However, women need more iron, due to menstruation"

So you believe women are bleeding to death. That is illogical and isn't true. Menses lower iron levels in the body to a safe level. Lack of menses , due to menopause , hysterectomy or some of the contraceptive pills cause a buildup of iron. This was first noticed thirty years ago by Dr. Jerome Sullivan who wondered why women do not get heart attacks anywhere near men , until though , they hit menopause. Far from being iron deficient , women are normal , men are iron overloaded because they have no effective method of excreting excess iron.

"Is Iron a Killer?"

"Why Do Men Have More Heart Attacks Than Women? A New Study Poses An Unexpected Question"

aliberaldoseofskepticism
aliberaldoseofskepticism

@TomHennessy This man ain't no herbivore!

Seriously, I would love to see citations of peer-reviewed journals to back up everything you claim.

Oxidation is related to all metabolism. Antioxidants reduce oxidation (hence the name). Iron isn't involved in oxidation. Iron can oxidize, but when it's bound in hemoglobin, it reacts differently, for much the same reason that putting a match near water causes it to neither burn nor explode, though H2 and O2 react to a flame that way.

(By the way, you'll be glad to know, oxidation is also one of the body's defenses against infections, such as malaria.)

Diabetes is more related to obesity. Things like diabetic blindness are related to eating a lot of carbohydrate while diabetic. This can be mitigated with insulin, though.

Rin_
Rin_

All those studies suggest is the following: 

synthetic vitamin E from petroleum sources is probably not particularly good for you.


Big woop.


If you're going to do a study at least do it properly. Use vitamin E from a natural source like flaxseed oil. Or make it CLEAR the vitamin E was synthetic. 

Which of course they... never do. 

TomHennessy
TomHennessy

That would depend on whether you are a meat eater or not and also depends on whether you consider hemochromatosis to mean, genetic iron overload, or whether you think hemochromatosis means secondary iron overload, as is found in the fruit bat given meat.

"Egyptian fruit bats will develop hemochromatosis when fed high levels of dietary iron"

Meat iron / heme iron , is not controlled and is absorbed even when the body is not absorbing other types of iron, that iron not from meat.

"Unlike nonheme iron,heme iron absorption is not substantially reduced as iron stores increase."

TomHennessy
TomHennessy

"Iron isn't involved in oxidation"

This fellow, one of many, seems to think it is, when it is not bound up, when it is too high in the body.

"Iron behaving badly: inappropriate iron chelation as a major contributor to the aetiology of vascular and other progressive inflammatory and degenerative diseases."